« May 2008 | Main | July 2008 »

June 27, 2008

back up your data! now!

Interestingly enough, the last post is more or less what I said when my MacBook Pro’s hard drive suddenly died a few days ago. Actually, those seven words were just the starting point.

I always stress backing up data to my clients. And all my work files are duplicated on my desktop G5 and a separate backup drive, and a backup runs automatically every night. But I had a couple technical glitches trying to set up an automatic network backup for the laptop, and just never got around to figuring it out. So I was backing up manually. I think you know how that went. It had been a couple of months since I remembered to do it.

As important as my work files are, my mail, invoices, Quicken registers, and address book were all on the laptop. Duh. Actually, the worst thing may be—I didn’t realize this until this morning, and it still makes me sick to my stomach—I never even thought about backing up my iPhoto library. So I lost two years of photos. It’s like losing two years of my life. Not that they were great photos, just pictures of whatever I saw that seemed like a good image, or friends doing things, gig photos, cat photos, and so forth. Shit. Shit. Shit. Shit.

As for the mail, people who are expecting email from me should please write me again. I can reconstruct invoices from PDF files and such. I can download Quicken files from the bank, and mostly reconstruct my address book from business cards and whatnot (again, please feel free to email me if we first made contact in the last few months). But the photos—except for a few I liked a lot and edited in Photoshop—are just gone, gone, gone.

The bright spot in this is that Apple is replacing the hard drive for free. While the tech with whom I set up the return told me it would be about three and a half weeks before I got my computer back, I just now got an email saying the repair had been completed and I should have the computer again in two business days. And you can bet that from now on I have indeed found religion when it comes to making complete and thorough backups.

Of course all this means I still haven’t fixed the comments on this blog. Sorry. Again, you can email me as ptomek AT kc.rr.com.

June 24, 2008

in memory of George Carlin

Shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits.

June 22, 2008

here we go again

It’s been a few more months, so it’s time for Congress to try to pass the telecom immunity act again. This time it looks like they may well get it through.

It’s been a mystery to many people (including me) as to why the Democrats are capitulating once again (and calling it a compromise), when obviously all they have to do is wait a few months until their majority will almost certainly be larger, no matter who wins the White House. There’s no danger to the country by waiting—all they have to do is extend the Protect America Act for a few months, which they have already done before. Then we could finally find out what the Bush administration and the telecoms did over the last several years. And the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution would remain intact, and we don’t have the horrible precedent of Congress immunizing corporations for (almost certain) lawbreaking without even knowing what they did.

The answer appears to be that the Democratic leadership is complicit in the Adminstration’s lawbreaking and is equally vested in the idea that it never sees the light of day. On a Countdown program a couple days ago, Keith Olbermann interviewed constitutional law scholar Jonathan Turley (not exactly a fire-breathing leftist) about this issue:

Turley: People need to be very, very much aware of this bill. What you’re seeing in this bill is an evisceration of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. It is something that allows the President and the government to go into law-abiding homes on their word alone, their suspicion alone, and to engage in warrantless surveillance. That’s what the framers that drafted the Fourth Amendment wanted to prevent.

Olbermann: And also hidden in here behind this headline: If you immunize the telecoms, are you not also immunizing the President? The Bush administration and to some degree the Congress that went along with all of these crimes in the last seven years?

Turley: Oh, there’s no question in my mind that there is an obvious level of collusion here. We now know that the Democratic leadership knew about the electronic surveillance program, almost from its inception. Even when they were campaigning about fighting for civil liberties they were aware there was an unlawful surveillance program as well as a torture program. And ever since that came out the Democrats have been silently trying to kill any effort to hold anyone accountable, because that list could include some of their own members. And I’m afraid this is Washington politics at their worst. And so, I think that what you’re seeing with this bill is not just caving in to a very powerful lobby but also caving in to some of the worst motivations on Capitol Hill since 9/11. You know, the Administration was very adept at bringing in Democrats at a time when they knew they couldn’t refuse, to make them buy into this program, and now that investment is bearing fruit.

Olbermann: So it’s self-protection is the answer to the question of why Congress did not let FISA just—this bill at least—go sunset and do this in the next administration. The answer is really self-protection?

Turley: I’m afraid it is. And I also don’t understand why they didn’t let that happen, because what you would be left with was judges who would have to look at whether there was a basis for engaging in surveillance. What’s so horrible about that?…

Olbermann: So this is not FISA, this is CYA.

I certainly have my differences with Keith Olbermann, but I think he’s right on the money with this one. You can see the video clip after the jump.

June 15, 2008

squ

A search in my iTunes library for “squ” turned up

  1. Quisquose / Cocteau Twins
  2. On Squirrel Hilll / Ian Matthews
  3. Squalor Victoria / The National
  4. American Squirm / Nick Lowe
  5. Turn a Square / The Shins
  6. Tommib / Squarepusher

as well as everything I have by Squeeze, which is what I was actually looking for. Nevertheless, I’ve had fun listening to this unlikely combination of songs. Man, does it feel good to hear “American Squirm” again! Plus I’ve kind of been obsessed with “Another Nail For My Heart” lately.

“we got the wrong guys”

For years there have been rumors that many, even most, of the detainees at Guantanamo had no reason to be there. Now McClatchy has started pubhlishing a series of articles titled “Guantanamo: Beyond the Law” based on an eight-month investigation of the detention system created after the September 11 terrorist attacks. The series begins today with “We got the wrong guys.” A sample:

The McClatchy investigation found that top Bush administration officials knew within months of opening the Guantanamo detention center that many of the prisoners there weren't "the worst of the worst." From the moment that Guantanamo opened in early 2002, former Secretary of the Army Thomas White said, it was obvious that at least a third of the population didn't belong there.

Of the 66 detainees whom McClatchy interviewed, the evidence indicates that 34 of them, about 52 percent, had connections with militant groups or activities. At least 23 of those 34, however, were Taliban foot soldiers, conscripts, low-level volunteers or adventure-seekers who knew nothing about global terrorism.

Only seven of the 66 were in positions to have had any ties to al Qaida's leadership, and it isn't clear that any of them knew any terrorists of consequence.

If the former detainees whom McClatchy interviewed are any indication — and several former high-ranking U.S. administration and defense officials said in interviews that they are — most of the prisoners at Guantanamo weren't terrorist masterminds but men who were of no intelligence value in the war on terrorism.

When you have a former Secretary of the Army saying at least a third of the detainees didn’t even belong there, it seems like we as a country have a problem (Yeah, I know: Duh.). Especially when the Administration—aided and abetted by a craven Congress—has insisted we give up basic civil rights like habeas corpus and the right to confront your accusers in order to keep the detainees there. Please note that last week’s Supreme Court decision, while still a stinging slap in the face to the Bush administration, does nothing to dismantle Guantanamo. It merely gives the detainees the right to challenge their detention.

I had read articles as far back as 2002 saying that a number of detainees were picked up because the Americans had offered cash rewards for Al Qaeda members, and enterprising Afghans had picked up on the chance to settle personal grudges and grab some cash in one fell swoop. Now, thanks to McClatchy’s painstaking research, we have what seems to be solid evidence that indeed that is what happened in at least some cases. Despite what some deranged commentators are saying, isn’t our entire justice system supposed to be based on the presumption of innocence?

June 08, 2008

apologies

Sorry that the comments appear to be hosed at the moment. Actually, Chris was kind enough to give me a heads-up about this several weeks ago and I was so busy I forgot. I should have known something was up when my spam comment rate went from 50 a day to one a week. Anyway, I hope to have it fixed soon.

Update: Hmm, it’s nothing obvious. The error logs show some kind of unexpected end-of-file in the script, but I’ve replaced the CGI files with copies from my hard drive with no luck. Probably the best thing to do is upgrade Movable Type, since I’m running a three year old version of it. Which I will do, when I have time. Don’t hold your breath. In the meantime, if you have any suggestions about Movable Type or want to comment via email, just contact me as ptomek AT kc.rr.com, okay?

neither monkey nor genius

Every once in a while you read an article that makes you feel like the top of your head has been blown off. That’s how I feel about “In The Air,” an article by Malcolm Gladwell from a recent New Yorker magazine.

Everyone assumes that good ideas are rare, and that those who can come up with good ideas are rarer still. No one expects that there are ever going to be a lot of Einsteins, or Edisons, or Darwins walking around the planet. And yet, when you look at the history of science, nearly every major breakthrough was made by more than one person. It’s really just for convenience that we remember Darwin instead of Wallace for the concept of natural selecton. In fact, according to the article, a 1922 paper lists multiple discoverers of 148 major scientific ideas:

Newton and Leibniz both discovered calculus. Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace both discovered evolution. Three mathematicians “invented” decimal fractions. Oxygen was discovered by Joseph Priestley, in Wiltshire, in 1774, and by Carl Wilhelm Scheele, in Uppsala, a year earlier. Color photography was invented at the same time by Charles Cros and by Louis Ducos du Hauron, in France. Logarithms were invented by John Napier and Henry Briggs in Britain, and by Joost Bürgi in Switzerland. “There were four independent discoveries of sunspots, all in 1611; namely, by Galileo in Italy, Scheiner in Germany, Fabricius in Holland and Harriott in England….”

It begins to look as if many scientific discoveries are inevitable—they are simply “in the air” at a particular time. What if, instead of waiting for some genius to put it all together, we began to systematically look for the hundreds or thousands of brilliant ideas that are in fact all around us?

A man named Nathan Myhrvold and his company Intellectual Ventures are attempting to do just that. A former Microsoft whiz kid and dinosaur enthusiast, Myrhvold decided to systematically look for dinosaur fossils in Montana, instead of doing the traditional catch-as-catch-can, kind of gold-prospector fossil search as it has generally been done. His teams “found dinosaur bones by the truckload…. People weren’t finding dinosaur bones, and they assumed that it was because they were rare. But—and almost everything that Myhrvold has been up to during the past half decade follows from this fact—it was our fault. We didn’t look hard enough.” From 1909 to 1999, the world found 19 T. Rex specimens. Since 1999, Myrhvold has found nine more.

As I understand it, Intellectual Ventures attempts to mine ideas in a similar way, by putting smart people together to systematically search for good ideas. It is not the proverbial million monkeys at their typewriters, and neither is it the lonely man of genius toiling at his Great Idea for years on end. Instead, it’s more like running a sieve through the contemporary air and seeing what gets caught. The samples—Intellectual Ventures is patenting more than 500 ideas per year—mentioned in the article are frequently breathtaking. Take for example nuclear power:

“[Legendary physicist Edward] Teller had this idea way back when that you could make a very safe, passive nuclear reactor,” Myhrvold explained. “No moving parts. Proliferation-resistant. Dead simple. Every serious nuclear accident involves operator error, so you want to eliminate the operator altogether. Lowell and Rod and others wrote a paper on it once. So we did several sessions on it.”

The plant, as they conceived it, would produce something like one to three gigawatts of power, which is enough to serve a medium-sized city. The reactor core would be no more than several metres wide and about ten metres long. It would be enclosed in a sealed, armored box. The box would work for thirty years, without need for refuelling. Wood’s idea was that the box would run on thorium, which is a very common, mildly radioactive metal. (The world has roughly a hundred-thousand-year supply, he figures.) Myhrvold’s idea was that it should run on spent fuel from existing power plants. “Waste has negative cost,” Myhrvold said. “This is how we make this idea politically and regulatorily attractive. Lowell and I had a monthlong no-holds-barred nuclear-physics battle. He didn’t believe waste would work. It turns out it does.” Myhrvold grinned. “He concedes it now.”

It was a long-shot idea, easily fifteen years from reality, if it became a reality at all. It was just a tantalizing idea at this point, but who wasn’t interested in seeing where it would lead?

I don’t remember the exact figure, but something like two-thirds of all the scientists who have ever lived are alive now. It follows that there are a lot of ideas in the air. Ideas that can really make a difference, maybe even get us out of some of the messes we have gotten ourselves in. I found this article to be a revelation. A reason to get excited, and a reason to hope.

June 07, 2008

quality you can smell

I stay away from product endorsements here in general, but this is too funny not to post: Some Russians put a small Tapco mixer through extreme quality testing: it’s run over by a Jeep, set on fire, and used as both a hammer and a basketball. At the end, it’s bedraggled but entirely functional. Wow.

You can watch it after the jump.

FWIW, I’ve used Tapco and Mackie products for ages and always been quite happy with the bang you get for the buck: it’s not high-end pro stuff, but great for small home studios, live sound, etc. In fact, I just bought a Mackie 24 channel 8-bus mixer for my home studio. There have been too many times when I needed some kind of mixing board, rather than doing everything inside the Mac. However, I think I will skip the test routine.

June 04, 2008

memo to Scott McClellan

A couple McClatchey reporters—among the few journalists who have nothing to be ashamed of for their coverage of the runup to the war in Iraq—respond to Scott McClellan’s book and his critics. For one thing, as they demonstrate with links to their contemporary articles, McClellan’s book is not news—it’s just that most of the media was swallowing the Bush narrative whole. It’s pretty sad when the former Presidential press secretary says the press corps went too easy on the administration. Anyway, the McClatchey article is excellent.

And if you never saw Bill Moyer’s Buying the War on PBS, you owe it to yourself to watch it.

“Technology is awesome”

OMG. I laughed and laughed.

Via Balloon Juice, which is also well worth a read.