death of a dictator
I have no sympathy for Saddam Hussein. I don’t support the death penalty, but if anyone deserved it he probably did.
But the way this all came down just feels wrong. Juan Cole said it better than anybody else I’ve read. He has an article at Salon, which unfortunately requires you to view a brief commercial before you can access their content. I checked his site, but it only links to the Salon article, though it does also point to other reading.
Here’s the gist of Cole’s article:
The execution provoked intense questions about whether his trial was fair and about what the fallout will be. One thing is certain: The trial and execution of Saddam were about revenge, not justice. Instead of promoting national reconciliation, this act of revenge helped Saddam portray himself one last time as a symbol of Sunni Arab resistance, and became one more incitement to sectarian warfare.
He does go on to explain exactly how fouled up this whole matter has been, like everything else in Iraq. Cole points out how if Saddam had been tried for any of the thousands of Sunnis he killed, there was a chance this trial could have helped national unity rather being a detriment. But once again, the path to one of the worst possible outcomes was taken. And now Saddam is a martyr for the Sunnis and another wedge between the various Iraqi factions.
I’ll try to have a more cheerful post tomorrow; right now I’m on an iffy internet connection at my gig, hanging around waiting for dinner.
Update: Reactions to the execution from Wolcott, Josh Marshall, Tom Watson. But if you read anything, read this post by Christy Hardin Smith at Firedoglake. She has worked as both a defense attorney and prosecutor, and her essay is moving and illuminating.




